Browse sections
CAPEX

CAPEX model in MAD with conservative scenario ranges

Planning-grade CAPEX structure split across core construction, technical systems, specialty equipment, professional fees, and contingency.

Executive KPI Strip

Low CAPEX

MAD 245,700,000

Includes contingency.

Base CAPEX

MAD 318,325,000

Reference underwriting scenario.

High CAPEX

MAD 412,500,000

Stress case with larger contingency.

Base MAD/m²

MAD 27,680

Based on 11,500 m² gross placeholder.

CAPEX Table (MAD)

Low/Base/High range per category.

CategoryLowBaseHigh
Structure & civil worksMAD 95,000,000MAD 112,000,000MAD 132,000,000
Second works / architectural finishesMAD 32,000,000MAD 41,000,000MAD 53,000,000
MEP (HVAC, electrical, plumbing, fire)MAD 48,000,000MAD 59,000,000MAD 73,000,000
Acoustic treatment (club + studios)MAD 12,000,000MAD 17,000,000MAD 24,000,000
IT & security (CCTV, access, network segmentation)MAD 10,000,000MAD 14,000,000MAD 19,000,000
Gaming & esports equipmentMAD 10,000,000MAD 15,000,000MAD 21,000,000
Gym & wellness equipmentMAD 6,000,000MAD 9,500,000MAD 13,000,000
Food hall infrastructure (extraction / ventilation)MAD 8,000,000MAD 12,000,000MAD 16,000,000
Professional fees (architect, engineering, legal)MAD 13,000,000MAD 18,000,000MAD 24,000,000
Contingency (5-10%)MAD 11,700,000MAD 20,825,000MAD 37,500,000

CAPEX Breakdown (Base Scenario)

Category-level cost contribution in MAD. Values are planning assumptions requiring technical validation.

Estimation Notes

Scope assumptions and validation path.

CAPEX Framework (MAD)

The CAPEX model is structured for lender and investment committee readability. It separates core construction, technical systems, specialty fit-out, professional fees, and contingency.

Estimation Principles

  • Conservative ranges: low/base/high scenarios.
  • Explicit contingency in the 5% to 10% range.
  • Separate treatment for acoustics and cybersecurity-related systems.
  • MAD per m² indicator based on a placeholder gross area.

Important Note

Values shown are planning-grade assumptions and should be validated through architect and engineering APS/APD packages, quantity surveyor review, and tender-market feedback.